• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Real Estate - Daly City

real-estate-daly-city.com

Juliana Lee Team / 2026-01-10

Do Corporate Investors Push Up Home Prices?

“Though inveighing against big monied investors for the high cost of housing is a “huge distraction,” it has obvious political appeal, said Stan Oklobdzija, a UC Riverside public policy professor. “Attacking institutional investors is the latest iteration of appearing to do something without actually doing anything. …It’s just kind of archetypical cheap talk.” – CAL MATTERS

Silicon Valley residents and employees look around and they do not see large corporate investors buying up single-family homes as rental properties. However there is a local presence that buys single family homes – Stanford University.

Stanford University publishes information about the housing it owns.

  • On-Campus faculty ownership units: 900
  • Off-Campus rental housing for affiliates: 1,600
  • Off-Campus faculty ownership units: 250
  • Off-Campus housing units for general community: 1,200

The 3,950 units it owns is a significant ownership. Stanford University’s housing ownership helps it to attract employees and students. Having the housing near the university reduces commute traffic. It would be hard to argue that its ownership creates problems. It is an organization that aids its people to obtain housing. Should more companies and government entities do the same? Doesn’t that make it harder and more costly for people not working for those companies to obtain housing?

Fixing A Problem Or Heading Off A Problem

Regulations that prevent a problem are most likely cheaper and more effective than trying to fix a problem after it is created. However, if the regulations are falsely proposed as a fix to an existing problem, needed solutions likely won’t be addressed.

The California Research Board examined home ownership by investors having more than 10 units. Current large investor ownership in Silicon Valley counties is approximately:

  • San Mateo 1.8%
  • Santa Clara 2.8%
  • Alameda 3.5%
  • Contra Costa 3.1%
  • Santa Cruz 3.7%

Companies like Invitation Homes, Blackstone, Progress Residential and AMH Homes have focused on markets with relatively low prices and rapidly growing populations. Silicon Valley is not attractive to corporate investments in housing for rental income. The Urban Institute found that institutional investors typically respond to, rather than cause, rent price increases.

More information about Corporate Ownership Of Single Family Homes is available.

Filed Under: Real estate trends Tagged With: home prices, investor owned homes

Primary Sidebar

JLee Realty
Homes For Sale

Silicon Valley Cities

  1. Atherton
  2. Belmont
  3. Brisbane
  4. Burlingame
  5. Campbell
  6. Cupertino
  7. Daly City
  8. East Palo Alto
  9. Foster City
  10. Fremont
  11. Hillsborough
  12. Los Altos
  13. Los Altos Hills
  14. Los Gatos
  15. Menlo Park
  16. Millbrae
  17. Milpitas
  18. Monte Sereno
  19. Mountain View
  20. Newark
  21. Pacifica
  22. Palo Alto
  23. Portola Valley
  24. Redwood City
  25. Redwood Shores
  26. San Bruno
  27. San Carlos
  28. San Jose
  29. San Mateo
  30. Santa Clara
  31. Saratoga
  32. South San Francisco
  33. Sunnyvale
  34. Union City
  35. Woodside

Recent Posts

  • Do Corporate Investors Push Up Home Prices?
  • Opendoor iBuyer – FTC: cheating is not innovation

Categories

  • Daly City home prices
  • Real estate trends

Daly City Real Estate - Daly City Homes For Sale - Daly City Real Estate Trends

Juliana Lee - JLee Realty
dre: 00851314 - 02103053
[email protected] · 650-857-1000
4260 El Camino Real, Palo Alto CA 94306
visit julianalee.com

Silicon Valley Real Estate  -  Silicon Valley Homes  -  CA Homes For Sale